[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.16.1
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: 2.16.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:29:18 +0200 |
2012/10/22 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> So that leaves the po files. Should I merge them over from translation
>> or not?
>>
>> Francisco, any idea?
>
> Turns out that running "make po-update" on the current version I arrived
> at leaves stuff unchanged.
Then do nothing. (Can you 'do nothing'?) I am not sure we are using
Documentation/po files; we were in the past (and for a very useful
purpose), but something is currently broken until somebody (me) takes
it a look.
<root>/po files are a different thing: they are for the program
itself, not translations.
> This does not affect translation at all: translation work
> of the stable branch should continue until complete.
Great!
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: 2.16.1, (continued)
- Re: 2.16.1, Federico Bruni, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, Federico Bruni, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/23
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/23
Re: 2.16.1, Phil Holmes, 2012/10/24