Re: 2.16.1

[David Kastrup]

Francisco Vila <address@hidden> writes:

> 2012/10/21 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>>> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation.  That should be
>>>> unproblematic.
>>>
>>> The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much
>>> to address this part of my plan.
>>>
>>> I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch
>>> translation-staging.  It is obvious that I suffer from a case of having
>>> not kept track of how translations are actually organized, so it may be
>>> possible that someone would need to hand-advance translation-staging to
>>> match translation, assuming that the organization of
>>> translation/translation-staging is similar to master/staging with regard
>>> to automatic testing.
>>>
>>> Ugh.  Sorry for that.  With the apparent lack of
>>> replies/comments/interest (possibly due to the translation list just
>>> downing any contribution from non-list-members), I felt I needed to move
>>> ahead in _some_ manner.
>>
>> Ok, it would appear that translation had been ahead translation-staging
>> already before my merge, so it seems I should take no guesses here and
>> just let people who actually know what translation-staging is for deal
>> with it.
>
> I think translation-staging is an just experiment from John which he
> did not publicly announce. Or I don't remember it.

In that case, if this experiment is no longer active, can we just remove
this branch in order to avoid confusion?  John?

-- 
David Kastrup