[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.16.1
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: 2.16.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:20:50 +0200 |
2012/10/22 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>
> Here is another problem with translations that is rather curious:
> commit bf1900d44f4937fe8e69e0e04e188a0c3daf5172
> Author: Francisco Vila <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu May 31 11:18:26 2012 +0200
>
> has some bit of English content in here that is totally out of place:
>
I first copy, then translate. If the number of translated paragraphs
is less than the number of copied paragraphs, that happens.
> address@hidden now takes an optional layout object specification. It can
> +be used for tweaking layout objects that are only indirectly caused by
> +the tweaked event, like accidentals, stems, and flags:
> +
> address@hidden,quote,ragged-right,relative=2]
> +<\tweak Accidental #'color #red cis4
> + \tweak Accidental #'color #green es
> + g>
> address@hidden lilypond
>
> and that causes documentation compilation of issue 2883 to fail after
> syntax changes.
I have pushed the missing translation.
But the @lilypond snippet matches the one from original English in
Documentation/changes.tely , all snippets do match, so how can the
Spanish version break anything?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: 2.16.1, (continued)
- Re: 2.16.1, Federico Bruni, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/23
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/23
Re: 2.16.1, Phil Holmes, 2012/10/24
Re: 2.16.1, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/10/24