Re: 2.16.1

[Francisco Vila]

2012/10/21 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation.  That should be
>>> unproblematic.
>>
>> The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much
>> to address this part of my plan.
>>
>> I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch
>> translation-staging.  It is obvious that I suffer from a case of having
>> not kept track of how translations are actually organized, so it may be
>> possible that someone would need to hand-advance translation-staging to
>> match translation, assuming that the organization of
>> translation/translation-staging is similar to master/staging with regard
>> to automatic testing.
>>
>> Ugh.  Sorry for that.  With the apparent lack of
>> replies/comments/interest (possibly due to the translation list just
>> downing any contribution from non-list-members), I felt I needed to move
>> ahead in _some_ manner.
>
> Ok, it would appear that translation had been ahead translation-staging
> already before my merge, so it seems I should take no guesses here and
> just let people who actually know what translation-staging is for deal
> with it.

I think translation-staging is an just experiment from John which he
did not publicly announce. Or I don't remember it.
-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com