Re: 2.16.1

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

>> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation.  That should be
>> unproblematic.
>
> The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much
> to address this part of my plan.
>
> I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch
> translation-staging.  It is obvious that I suffer from a case of having
> not kept track of how translations are actually organized, so it may be
> possible that someone would need to hand-advance translation-staging to
> match translation, assuming that the organization of
> translation/translation-staging is similar to master/staging with regard
> to automatic testing.
>
> Ugh.  Sorry for that.  With the apparent lack of
> replies/comments/interest (possibly due to the translation list just
> downing any contribution from non-list-members), I felt I needed to move
> ahead in _some_ manner.

Ok, it would appear that translation had been ahead translation-staging
already before my merge, so it seems I should take no guesses here and
just let people who actually know what translation-staging is for deal
with it.

-- 
David Kastrup