[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tie Crusade
From: |
Frédéric Bron |
Subject: |
Re: Tie Crusade |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:42:05 +0200 |
>> I see this in your "bad" examples of ties:
>> d'4~ s4 d' s2 e'4~ s4 e' s
>>
>> How do you justify that this should work with non logical spacers included?
>
> What do you mean by "non logical spacers"? I don't quite understand
> this question.
I mean why would you write d'4~ s4 d' in real life?
but OK, I had not seen tieWaitForNote. So I understand that it should
work the way you did it.
Frédéric
- Re: Tie Crusade, Frédéric Bron, 2013/07/14
- Re: Tie Crusade, Janek Warchoł, 2013/07/14
- Re: Tie Crusade,
Frédéric Bron <=
- Re: Tie Crusade, Janek Warchoł, 2013/07/14
- Re: Tie Crusade, Frédéric Bron, 2013/07/14
- Re: Tie Crusade, Janek Warchoł, 2013/07/14
- Re: Tie Crusade, Frédéric Bron, 2013/07/14
- Re: Tie Crusade, Janek Warchoł, 2013/07/14