[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:16:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Here is a scan from a Peters edition of Grieg with somewhat flamboyantly
executed slurs (I am almost sure that the engraver had felt some grim
satisfaction when doing those).
LilyPond's rendition of the slurs is actually reasonable readable.
However, the measures take probably 40% more width.
And the tuplet numbers are definitely awful. I tried it with 2.16.2,
and the results were either equally awful, or one of the tuplet numbers
was written in the middle of the beams. Can't reproduce this right now
with -dpreview, however, so whether the tuplet numbers are in the clouds
or the beams probably depends on some internal evaluation order.
--
David Kastrup
- Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2013/12/03
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, David Nalesnik, 2013/12/03
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2013/12/03
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/03
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2013/12/03
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/03
- Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2013/12/03
Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/12/03