|
From: | James |
Subject: | Re: Confusing documentation of show-available-fonts |
Date: | Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:26:39 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 06/02/14 14:30, Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello. Here http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/fonts.html#single-entry-fonts shouldn't we say "The following console command" or similar, instead of "The following command" which erroneusly suggests a lilypond command?
It is a lilypond command. lilypond -dshow... What else could it be?
Also, in lilypond -dshow-available-fonts x what's the 'x' for?
Hmm, with our without the 'x' I get the same output of the fonts listed. Perhaps it is a typo?
James
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |