Re: Fwd: MusicXML

[Urs Liska]

Hi David,

nice to read that. 

I think coming to GSoC with an idea is more important than the listed mentor 
availability. Continuing on the Scheme/XML track would be very rewarding.

However, for some reasons I'd try to go into a more generic direction. This 
could be very suitable for integration with other projects.

I'll get back to you in a few days.

Best
Urs



Am 18. Februar 2016 03:07:40 MEZ, schrieb David Garfinkle <address@hidden>:
>Hi there!
>
>Hope everyone had a lovely new year. School has kept me busy, but I'm
>still
>interested in continuing work on the MusicXML project that I started
>over
>the summer. I just caught up in mailing-list readings for the topic, so
>I
>think I'm correct in assuming that it hasn't been added to the code
>base
>yet, or edited, and that I can continue working locally without risk of
>re-doing work that has already been done by someone else.
>
>I'm also thinking about doing another summer of GSoC, but am undecided
>on
>what I should work on. I could continue with XML export, or I could
>work on
>a different project suggestion. As far as I know from Urs' compilation,
>there are three other project ideas (adding glyph variants, extending
>ScholarLY library, and adding chord structures) which have a primary
>mentor. On one hand, it would be beneficial to knock a more serious
>dent
>into MusicXML and kick down the door for easier contribution. On the
>other
>hand, it seems like the other three projects are less sprawling and it
>would be nice to see a definite conclusion to an issue or idea.
>Thoughts?
>
>In any event, I'm happy to continue working on MusicXML in whatever
>capacity I am able.
>
>Best,
>David
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-devel mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.