[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vertical movement without anchors
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: vertical movement without anchors |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:54:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> Just back from vacations, reading up the mails...
>
> I tested the code below with 2.16.2 and 2.19.44 and colored the ref-points.
> Images attached. Up to now they are simple observations, have to think
> about further implications...
>
> \relative d' {
> \stemUp
> \textLengthOn
> \set Staff.instrumentName = #(lilypond-version)
> d2^"foo"
> d'^"foo"
> d,^\markup \raise #4 "foo"
> d'^\markup \raise #4 "foo"
> d,^\markup { \null \raise #4 "foo" }
> d'^\markup { \null \raise #4 "foo" }
> d,^\markup \box \raise #4 "foo"
> d'^\markup \box \raise #4 "foo"
> d,^\markup \box { \null \raise #4 "foo" }
> d'^\markup \box { \null \raise #4 "foo" }
> d,^\markup \box \line { \null \raise #4 "foo" }
> d'^\markup \box \line { \null \raise #4 "foo" }
> }
That looks like the anchor point _is_ making a difference and that it is
part of the skyline ultimately used for positioning in 2.18 (a skyline
which fits beside the skyline of the opposing stem, resulting in a
tighter adjustment). However, I don't see this observation explain the
difference in behavior in the manual example. Does \textLengthOn have
anything to do with it?
--
David Kastrup
- vertical movement without anchors, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, Federico Bruni, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, Phil Holmes, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25