[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vertical movement without anchors
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: vertical movement without anchors |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:55:11 +0200 |
2016-07-25 14:54 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> That looks like the anchor point _is_ making a difference and that it is
> part of the skyline ultimately used for positioning in 2.18 (a skyline
> which fits beside the skyline of the opposing stem, resulting in a
> tighter adjustment). However, I don't see this observation explain the
> difference in behavior in the manual example. Does \textLengthOn have
> anything to do with it?
Attached images for 2.16 and 2.19 with and without textLengthOn,
debug-skylines applied, anchor-point still colored.
Cheers,
Harm
2.16.2-second.png
Description: PNG image
2.19.44-second.png
Description: PNG image
- vertical movement without anchors, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, Federico Bruni, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, Phil Holmes, 2016/07/25
- Re: vertical movement without anchors, David Kastrup, 2016/07/25