[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GUB |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:30:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> In May, when we were discussing the limitations of 32 bit MinGW, I
> asked Jan for an estimate of how much work it would be to add a 64-bt
> MinGW to GUB.
>
> His answer was that GUB is a hack, and that he wasn't interested in
> putting any more effort into fixing up GUB, although he would
> certainly provide me advice if I asked for it.
>
> His recommendation was to move to Guix[1], which is an existing and
> supporting package for maintaining appropriate package versions for a
> particular user. He said he would be willing to help with that, as
> it's making things better, not just spending more effort on a hack.
>
> Are there any opinions on whether we should pursue a move to Guix?
Wouldn't that mean abandoning Windows?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: GUB, (continued)
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/16
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, James Lowe, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Karlin High, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10