[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GUB |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:42:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Masamichi Hosoda <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Ubuntu 14 for both. I would expect Ubuntu 16 to work but have not tried it.
>>
>> Not sure about that. We had several incompatibilities in the LilyPond
>> code base since then (2.18.2 does not compile on current GCC versions)
>> and GCC is written in C++ these days. Though the bootstrap process
>> might actually go through C-written GCC to get to its C++ compiler: not
>> sure about that.
>
> I tried to use GUB in Ubuntu 16.04 LTE 64 bit.
> But It failed with some errors.
>
> So I use GUB in Ubuntu 14.04 LTE 64 bit.
> I have not tried Ubuntu 18.04 LTE yet.
Seems like we don't have a lot of options other than porting the
bootstrap forward and I am not sure that all operating systems will stay
with us. I'd actually be more comfortable with regard to licensing
clarity to move the MacOSX bootstrap to OpenDarwin, but I seem to
remember that OpenDarwin more or less is dead due to Apple not keeping
their promises.
--
David Kastrup
- GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/06
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/06
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/16
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, James Lowe, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/10