[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: GUB |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jul 2018 21:33:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.e.1.180613 |
In May, when we were discussing the limitations of 32 bit MinGW, I asked Jan
for an estimate of how much work it would be to add a 64-bt MinGW to GUB.
His answer was that GUB is a hack, and that he wasn't interested in putting any
more effort into fixing up GUB, although he would certainly provide me advice
if I asked for it.
His recommendation was to move to Guix[1], which is an existing and supporting
package for maintaining appropriate package versions for a particular user. He
said he would be willing to help with that, as it's making things better, not
just spending more effort on a hack.
Are there any opinions on whether we should pursue a move to Guix?
Thanks,
Carl
1. https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Package-Management.html
- Re: GUB, (continued)
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/16
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/09
- Re: GUB, James Lowe, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Karlin High, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/10