Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden)

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Halving the useful range before overflows is a problem, so I'll stick
> with most of the guards.  Though I am skeptical that stuff exceeding I64
> has much of a chance of working well, anyway.

I have pushed a slightly modified version of the patch (removing the
__APPLE__ guard since that problem is likely only dependent on GCC
version) to stable-2.20.  Let's see where this gets us.

Thanks particularly to Masamichi Hosoda for some really impressive bug
hunt and fast proposing of solutions.

-- 
David Kastrup