[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New build:
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: New build: |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:51:00 +0100 |
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 17:47 Uhr schrieb Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2020 3:50 PM
> Subject: Re: New build:
>
>
> > "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> The web site is now fairly up-to-date. I say "fairly" because "news"
> >> has not been updated. I believe this is because the website is
> >> actually built automatically from master, whereas I updated news in
> >> stable/2.20. I guess the simplest option is to cherry-pick my updates
> >> to the news files into staging. I remain a bit uncertain about git
> >> (and fairly out of practice). Could someone (David?) skilled in the
> >> art update staging from stable/2.20?
> >
> > On the way.
> >
> > --
> > David Kastrup
>
>
> LGTM. Website now up-to-date.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
I'd suggest to explicitly post an announcement on the user-list.
Asking for feedback, especially for issue
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4943/
and related ones.
Can't do myself, I've to run for my regular job now.
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- New build: was:Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Phil Holmes, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, Phil Holmes, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, Phil Holmes, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Masamichi Hosoda, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Phil Holmes, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Dan Eble, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Dan Eble, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/04