[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW librarie
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Feb 2020 16:57:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
> On Feb 4, 2020, at 09:44, Masamichi Hosoda <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> +// FIXME: workaround: In GUB, g++ 4.9.4 for darwin-x86,
>> +// it seems that static cast from `unsigned long long` to `double`
>> +// by x86 SSE2 raises an internal compile error.
>> +// However, static cast from `signed long long` to `double`
>> +// does not raise the error.
>> +// So we use it for a workaround.
>> +#if defined (__i386__) && defined (__APPLE__) && \
>> + defined (__SSE2_MATH__) && __GNUC__ < 5
>> + {
>> + I64 inum = num_;
>> + I64 iden = den_;
>> + return static_cast<double> (sign_) *
>> + static_cast<double> (inum) / static_cast<double> (iden);
>> + }
>> +#else
>> return (double)sign_ * (double)num_ / (double)den_;
>> +#endif
>
> Is the conditional code really necessary? Why not boil it down to the
> working code and a comment explaining the extra conversion to signed
> numbers?
That would be my impulse as well. It is not like this code appears to
have notable drawbacks for the unafflicted platforms.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: New build:, (continued)
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, Phil Holmes, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, David Kastrup, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, Phil Holmes, 2020/02/05
- Re: New build:, Thomas Morley, 2020/02/06
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Masamichi Hosoda, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Phil Holmes, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Dan Eble, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Dan Eble, 2020/02/04
- Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/02/04
Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), ArnoldTheresius, 2020/02/03
Re: Inline assembler fallback for _FPU_SETCW() missing in MINGW libraries (issue 577450043 by address@hidden), ArnoldTheresius, 2020/02/03