Re: State of LilyPond with Guile 2.2

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Sonntag, dem 18.04.2021 um 05:31 +0000 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > > I stand corrected.  Somehow I got the impression that compiled
> > > Scheme code is a 3.x thing only.
> > 
> > So with that hopefully clarified, does this change your assessment
> > that we should work towards forking our own Guile 1.8?
> 
> Working towards a fork of Guile 1.8 was never meant to be a good
> option, rather as a last resort if speed differences make normal work
> too painful.

Well, the question of this thread was: What is "too painful"? Do we
require less "speed differences" than what I measured? In general: What
are the criteria to "switch"?

Jonas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part