Re: State of LilyPond with Guile 2.2

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> Working towards a fork of Guile 1.8 was never meant to be a good
>> option, rather as a last resort if speed differences make normal
>> work too painful.
> 
> Well, the question of this thread was: What is "too painful"? Do we
> require less "speed differences" than what I measured? In general:
> What are the criteria to "switch"?

For me, the speed of Guile 2.x without compiled Scheme bytecode would
be too painful.


   Werner