Re: Blockers for Guile 2.2

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Samstag, dem 19.02.2022 um 21:04 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
> <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > > Having byte-compiled files in the
> > > user's cache removes the ability to completely uninstall and negates
> > > the ease of moving the installation around with static binaries.
> > 
> > Byte-compiled files from LilyPond never end up in the user's cache,
> > they always go to the versioned directory in share/ (as you write in
> > your other reply).
> 
> How would that work without the user having write permission there?

It doesn't. Compilation is an explicit choice by users right now, by
setting an environment variable. If they do this and can't write in the
installation directory, their problem.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part