Re: SMuFL name mapping update, 17 March

[owendlamb]

On 3/20/22 11:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>> * A glyph should be created for SMuFL's clefChangeCombining
> >>>    character.
> >>
> >> Really?  Why?
> >
> > I was following precedent. Bravura includes it, even though it's a
> > zero-width empty character.
>
> OK.
>
> >> If this is correct, no glyph is needed at all.
>
> This was a bit sloppy.  I meant 'no need for a visible glyph'.

Ah, OK.

> And it should also automatically create this zero-width empty
> character :-)

Great to hear!