Re: Should we be touching goops?

[Aaron Hill]

On 2022-06-06 5:24 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
> Putting a bit more meat on what this may mean:
>
> <https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1404>

This certainly lends some brevity being able to use operators rather 
than named procedures.  Providing all this is firstly correct and 
secondly reasonably performant, it seems like a good addition.

That said, I did find one surprise looking at [1].  I would not have 
expected 1+ (increment) to work without some way of Scheme knowing how 
to construct unity for a given type.  Am I just overlooking where such a 
<Moment> is being specified?  Or is there supposed to be a type-specific 
overload of 1+?  I am worried something might not have gotten committed.

[1]: 
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1404/diffs?commit_id=bafd55131495ad58d8c9eb4439f60c8789bc9dc8#98b870cc087eeb4becf470fa3ec9b05b85962f2f_115_109


-- Aaron Hill