[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond website
From: |
Pedro Kroger |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond website |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:43:39 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
* Nicolas Sceaux (address@hidden) wrote:
> The real issue is: what time does it take to write the score with
> LilyPond and Finale? IMHO tap tap tap is a lot faster than clic clic
> clic. Maybe the learning curve of LilyPond is longer (I don't know),
> but having regular text source code and command line are *features*,
> not drawbacks, because they make typesetting a lot faster, and reusing
> a lot easier.
I couldn't agree more. From my experience (10 years of finale and 1.5
of lilypond), the time to write a "complex" score is more or less the
same in both. But scores written in lilypond are far more maintainable
than in any binary format, specially if one uses CVS.
Cheers,
Pedro
- Lilypond website, Chip Zoller, 2004/01/04
- Re: Lilypond website, Aaron, 2004/01/04
- Re: Lilypond website, Nicolas Sceaux, 2004/01/04
- Re: Lilypond website,
Pedro Kroger <=
- Re: Lilypond website, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/01/04
- Re: Lilypond website, Pedro Kroger, 2004/01/04
- Re: Lilypond website, chip, 2004/01/04
- Lilypond website, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/04