Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> Or would you object to such a syntax change?
> 
> Only if it (adversely) affected the flexibility of whitespace
> elsewhere -- for example,
> 
>     g~   versus   g ~
>     g(  versus   g (
>     etc.

I use `g ~' also

> If the parser is smart enough to isolate the duration-whitespace
> from anythingelse-whitespace, then it won't affect my (current)
> code.

AFAIK, there must not be any other expression between a note name (or
chord) and a rhythm specification, so I don't see problems.


    Werner