Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

[Mats Bengtsson]

Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Another solution would be to say that numbers-only entry is only
> possible after having used an explicite duration:  e.g.
>
> c4 4 4 -> c4 c4 c4
>
> but
>
> c4 c 4 -> c4 c4
>
> This way we wouldn't break any existing code (but good luck for
> documenting that...)
>   
Ugly! Isn't this specific example a very good counter argument
to introduce this feature (at least not without using a syntax like
c4 &4 &4).

  /Mats