[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why do Lilyond Engravers have inhibitions to store their score in Mu
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: Why do Lilyond Engravers have inhibitions to store their score in Mutopia? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:19:36 +0200 |
2009/4/16 Hajo Dezelski <address@hidden>:
> - Why do Lilyond Engravers have inhibitions to store their score in Mutopia?
> - Are there any hidden fences which I am not able to see?
> - Are the copyright-restrictions the reason for keeping scores hidden?
> - Is Mutopia not worth contributing?
> - Why is Mutopia not the official music code repository for Lilypond?
How could all Mutopia sources be updated to a recent version?
Impossible, I guess.
> - Or am I misleaded?
>
> Ok, I must confess that sometimes it would be nice if for example
> corrections on a score could be managed by the one who put the music
> to Mutopia whithout having to ask Chris to do the "dirty" work.
Does Mutopia have any version control system? If I'm not wrong, it is
all email-based.
> OK, I also find the idea of Wilbert more than intriguing to use Google
> code as a base for scores including some versioning control.
Why it is intriguing for you? a CVS is better than none.
Sorry for making more questions than answering them. As I see it,
Mutopia looks more like an long-term storage than a live code
repository which is what lilypond sources need.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org