[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Treating a tie as a slur
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Treating a tie as a slur |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:11:26 +0100 |
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Lilypond would see if that were the case.
What, are you implying that LilyPond should decide that
#1:
a~ b
...means a slur
BUT
#2:
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
a~ b c d | e1 | a,
...means a tie
BUT
#3:
a~ b c d
[insert 42 measures here without an a]
a
...doesn't actually mean a tie, but should be treated as a slur instead?
This seems haphazard to me. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment?
Cheers,
Valentin.
- Treating a tie as a slur, Johan Vromans, 2010/11/11
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/11
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Johan Vromans, 2010/11/12
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/12
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, David Kastrup, 2010/11/13
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Carlo Stemberger, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, David Kastrup, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, David Kastrup, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Jan WarchoĊ, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Johan Vromans, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/14