[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Treating a tie as a slur
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Treating a tie as a slur |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:38:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Lilypond would see if that were the case.
>
> What, are you implying that LilyPond should decide that
>
> #1:
> a~ b
>
> ...means a slur
Means bad input. Configurable to be treated as a slur to b.
> BUT
>
> #2:
> \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
> a~ b c d | e1 | a,
>
> ...means a tie
Means a tie, as indicated by the user.
> BUT
>
> #3:
> a~ b c d
> [insert 42 measures here without an a]
> a
>
> ...doesn't actually mean a tie, but should be treated as a slur
> instead?
Means bad input. Configurable to be treated as a slur to b.
> This seems haphazard to me. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment?
Perhaps. I don't see the haphazardness.
--
David Kastrup
- Treating a tie as a slur, Johan Vromans, 2010/11/11
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/11
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Johan Vromans, 2010/11/12
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/12
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, David Kastrup, 2010/11/13
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Carlo Stemberger, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, David Kastrup, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Jan WarchoĊ, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Johan Vromans, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/14
- Re: Treating a tie as a slur, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/14