[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dynamics (and hairpins) attached to rests vs dynamics attached to no
From: |
Tiresia GIUNO |
Subject: |
Re: dynamics (and hairpins) attached to rests vs dynamics attached to notes |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:23:39 +0200 |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
eluze <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Tiresia Giuno wrote
> >
> >
> > I avoid using the Dynamics Context, because it places dynamics far
> > away from the staff (even if with LP 2.15 it looks much better)-
> > and hairpins are still slightly misaligned, see attached file.
> >
>
> of course there are ways to control the distance of a dynamic context
> to its (related) staff (I just don't bear them in my brain, please
> have a look at sth like /vertical spacing/ or similar)
>
>
>
> > I can't really remove the New_dynamic_engraver, because it is an
> > orchestral score, and I would loose the dynamics for the other
> > instruments.
> >
> >
>
> it's possible to remove the New_dynamic_engraver from only one Voice
> - I just showed a global way:
>
> with
> /\new Staff \new Voice \with {\remove New_dynamic_engraver }
> \musicOne/ all other staves and voices are not affected by this local
> change.
>
> now if you want all orchestral staves to look the same you have to
> use the same approach for all of them!
>
> Eluze
>
Thank you, I'll have a look on it. Still the alignment problem is still
there. I may need to change it manually.