lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dynamics (and hairpins) attached to rests vs dynamics attached to no


From: eluze
Subject: Re: dynamics (and hairpins) attached to rests vs dynamics attached to notes
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:47:59 -0700 (PDT)

Tiresia Giuno wrote
> 
> 
> I avoid using the Dynamics Context, because it places dynamics far away
> from the staff (even if with LP 2.15 it looks much better)- and hairpins
> are still slightly misaligned, see attached file.
> 

of course there are ways to control the distance of a dynamic context to its
(related) staff (I just don't bear them in my brain, please have a look at
sth like /vertical spacing/ or similar)



> I can't really remove the New_dynamic_engraver, because it is an
> orchestral score, and I would loose the dynamics for the other
> instruments.
> 
> 

it's possible to remove the New_dynamic_engraver from only one Voice - I
just showed a global way:

with 
/\new Staff  \new Voice \with {\remove New_dynamic_engraver } \musicOne/ all
other staves and voices are not affected by this local change.

now if you want all orchestral staves to look the same you have to use the
same approach for all of them!

Eluze



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dynamics-and-hairpins-attached-to-rests-vs-dynamics-attached-to-notes-tp130716p130729.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]