Re: Peer review

[Jay Anderson]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Craig Dabelstein
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is an appropriate request for the group, but I was
> wondering if anybody had the time to look at a sample part I have typeset
> and make any comments regarding the typesetting. There may be many things
> here that an experienced typesetter may see that need improvement, but my
> eyes don't pick up.

It looks pretty clean to me. I'm not an expert either, but here are a
few things:
- 'attaca' should be placed below the staff.
- The rest at the end on page 3 looks a little short for a page turn
(maybe not). It's certainly doable, but it's worth playing around.
Moving the page turn will most likely cause it to flow onto more
pages.
- Mvt. I measure 59 has an A natural. The following measure has an
A-flat? Add the cautionary accidental. There are similar issues like
this as well (Mvt. I measures 89-90, 91-92 with f-flat, f-natural - I
didn't check further.).

> I do think the part looks a little bit compressed, but I have used the page
> turn engraver (which I think is one of the greatest inventions of the modern
> world!) for instrumental parts such as these.

A4 is fairly narrow which could be part of the problem as well.

-----Jay