[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Peer review
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Peer review |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:44:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
Am 18.02.2015 um 03:30 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Lilyponders,
I'm not sure if this is an appropriate request for the group, but I was
wondering if anybody had the time to look at a sample part I have
typeset and make any comments regarding the typesetting. There may be
many things here that an experienced typesetter may see that need
improvement, but my eyes don't pick up.
Here is the link:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/614749/Berlioz-02-piccolo.pdf
I do think the part looks a little bit compressed, but I have used the
page turn engraver (which I think is one of the greatest inventions of
the modern world!) for instrumental parts such as these.
Many thanks,
Craig
Hi Craig, there's one (minor) issue for readability that I notice. It's
not your fault but LilyPond's but you may search for a way to improve it
nevertheless.
When tuplet number happen to fall into a staff they are not clearly
readable. Probably it doesn't matter too much because you don't actually
_read_ them anyway but just notice that they are there.
Especially problematic is when they fall exactly in a staff space as in
m. 134ff. where the extenders of the number coincide with the staff lines.
I'm not sure about the best treat, however. Some ideas:
- moving the numbers
- using whiteout
- selecting a heavier font face
I don't see a real treat for it, but you may take it as some input.
HTH
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org