lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:00:08 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1



Am 26.01.2016 um 16:58 schrieb Paul Morris:
On Jan 26, 2016, at 5:35 AM, Chris Yate <address@hidden> wrote:

BTW, is there a standard term for non-accidental notes?  You would think it would be “natural notes” but sometimes natural notes are also accidental notes.

In a chromatic scale, what are the accidental notes? They're certainly NOT notes with a sharp or flat, since you may already be in a key signature with those notes.

Well, right, that is my point.  Accidental notes are notes that aren’t in the current key (signature).  These are different distinctions:

1. sharp/flat notes & natural notes

2. notes not in the key (accidental notes) & notes in the key (???)

I don’t know that there's any term that’s the complement to “accidental notes” (besides writing out “notes in the key”).

Something with "alterated"?


-Paul


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]