[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 01:30:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi musicus,
>
> This may just be the result of forty years of performing and composing
> in the Western notation system (it’s always hard to overcome that kind
> of inertia)… but I find it easier to read the standard notation than
> your suggested alternative.
For "Western" music, I definitely have to agree. For
dodecaphonic/serial music, I can imagine a more chromatic notation
making sense. You'd still have to get the performers trained, though.
I remember some composition competition in Bochum where a winning or
placed entry (from the previous year?) was to be performed by a good
choir, and it had a ridiculous number of voice splits and rather
audacious tonality, and the choir ended up with most of the choir
members using tuning forks while performing.
With this kind of not-too-longish preparation from semi-professionals, a
different notation is not going to be helpful.
--
David Kastrup
Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/25
Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation,
David Kastrup <=
Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Paul Morris, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Nathan Ho, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Chris Yate, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Paul Morris, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Urs Liska, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, David Kastrup, 2016/01/26
- Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Paul Morris, 2016/01/26
Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation, Malte Meyn, 2016/01/26