[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New LilyPond website
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: New LilyPond website |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:01:26 +0100 |
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:54:16 +0100, Michael Gerdau <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm fine with using javascript on any site as long as I who generally
> and deliberately disables javascript can still use that site.
I'd like to add: There is good value in javascript for web sites. However,
an astonishing number of websites nowadays blindly include a vast
collection of 3rd party javascript. Thats' where the risks are, since you
cannot control what the 3rd parties will do (now, and in some future) with
their code and your data. And yes, that includes WP, Google Analytics,
JQuery, and so on.
So some local javascript can be pretty safe. 3rd party scripts? No thanks.
-- Johan
pgp_ZxqE1jQu2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: New LilyPond website, (continued)
- Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2016/12/02
- Re: New LilyPond website, Ivan Kuznetsov, 2016/12/10
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/12/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: New LilyPond website, Chris Yate, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Urs Liska, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Michael Gerdau, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: New LilyPond website, Shane Brandes, 2016/12/11
- Re: New LilyPond website, Urs Liska, 2016/12/11
Re: New LilyPond website, Federico Bruni, 2016/12/03