[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:13:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noeck <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Harm,
>
> IMHO that's a good explanation and according to the recurring questions
> on this list, sth. that would be helpful.
>
> I like the "attached to the note" much better than "not enclosed in"
> because the negative wording "not enclosed in" only tells what you
> _should not_ do and not what you _should_ do instead.
>
>> c'8-1---(-~-\markup "what-ever-remark"
>
> I didn't know that you can put that many - into it :)
>
>> c'8-1--(~\markup "what-ever-remark" c')
>
> The markup needs a hyphen. I'd suggest to drop the \markup here to make
> it simpler. In my personal rule set, the ~ goes last – but there is
> probably no reason for that …
Well, either ( or ~ continue to the next note.
It's actually worth mentioning (in this discussion, not necessarily in
the manual) that
{ c( d)( e) }
and
{ c( d() e) }
work identically, so the visual non-nestedness is not completely
guaranteed by design.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, (continued)
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, Thomas Morley, 2018/04/25
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, David Kastrup, 2018/04/25
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, Carl Sorensen, 2018/04/25
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, David Kastrup, 2018/04/25
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, Noeck, 2018/04/25
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, Simon Albrecht, 2018/04/25
- Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations, David Kastrup, 2018/04/24