|
From: | Craig Dabelstein |
Subject: | Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing |
Date: | Sun, 15 Jul 2018 09:46:00 +1000 |
Hi Craig,
Am 14.07.2018 um 01:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Urs,
Just confirming, as you've discovered, that compiling is lots slower.
Craig
Could you please be more specific? This assessment is somewhat surprising to me (although I wouldn't deny it's possible) because the slow-down *I* was talking about was a substantial programming error that has by now been fixed.
Could you try to come up with some numbers?
- Compilation time of the old system (with "old" input files) vs. updated?
- Compilation time of a large score (not using annotations) with the old or the new scholarLY module loaded or not loaded
- Is the slow-down noticeably related to the size of the score or to the number of annotations?
I know there *is* some overhead because I realized I have to store *all* grobs in a list before processing the annotations, which wasn't previously the case. But I wouldn't expect this to make a significant difference.
I wouldn't have had any suspicion that my other changes to the code would have any negative performance impact, quite the contrary.
Thanks for testing
Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |