[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tie direction !?
From: |
Torsten Hämmerle |
Subject: |
Re: tie direction !? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jul 2018 05:46:45 -0700 (MST) |
David Kastrup wrote
> Can be a memory-order thing. When two things compare equal, their final
> order of decisions can depend just on which choice happened to get a
> location lower in memory. In that case, the results need not even be
> deterministic given identical scores on the same platform with the same
> program.
Possibly yes. On the other hand, this never seem to happen if the exact
same situation is being moved away from Y-offset 0 (the middle line).
I think it'd be favourable in any case to have a well-defined tie direction
in these neutral cases, i.e. pointing away from the neutral stem direction.
Tie.neutral-direction gives the impression to determine the tie direction in
neutral/undecided cases, but it obviously doesn't.
As Harm said, explicitly setting the tie direction is very unsatisfactory at
least if transposing instruments are concerned.
Isn't that a case for the issue tracker? "Unambiguously respect
Tie.neutral-direction"?
All the best,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html