lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: harmonyli.ly beta 0.91 released


From: Karsten Reincke
Subject: Re: harmonyli.ly beta 0.91 released
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 14:31:59 +0100
User-agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2

> 
> Hi,
> 
> nice work.
> Haven't tried to use it so far, but regarding the example-images, I
> stumbled across things like:
> "DD̸[A]->D̸[S(As)]"
> Ofcourse decades passed since I learned functional analysis... But I
> was told to write something like:
> A:   DD̸
> As: D̸    [S]
> I.e in a column.
> Is the graphic you show how it's done nowadays or is due to coding-complexity?
> 
> Cheers,
>   Harm

Dear Harm;

If one looks at the Functional Harmony Analysis Symbols (as they were invented 
by
Riemann and De la Motte) as a modern computer linguist, then one has to state,
that its expressivity is not as exact as it is necessary. One very simple 
example:

Traditionally, intermediary symbols have to be embraced by brackets. The 
semantic
of these tokens shall be, that the denoted function refers to the next coming
chord / function instead to the tonal center:

C-Dur: T (D) D (D7) D7 T = C D G D7 G7 T

Very simple. But with this semantic one cannot express the often used deceptive
cadence: If you see ae chord row C D e G D7 G7 C, then the sub row 'D e' is a
traditional deceptive cadence. But the correspoding Function Analysis Subrow 
'(D)
Dp' is by defintion wrong.

For musical adequate analysis we must be able to speficy the context:

C-Major: T (D[D]) Dp (D7) D7 T = C D e G D7 G7 C

Another weakness of the existing 'analysis tradition' is, that modulations (=
change of a tonal focus) can not be expressed.

I expanded the traditional System by two elements to solve such musical
requirements:

(a) A Functional Analysis Symbol can be sub specified by the Focus to which it
refers. Such focus are indicated by square brackets [ ]. The Focus can either 
be a
keynote or a functional system.

(B) Each modulation is constructed by a chord which dunction is reinterpreted 
with
respect the next context. Such a link chord is indicated by an arrow and a box

C-Major: T S [Sp=>t] s D D7 t = C F d g A A7 d

I need this kind of expressivity for my own coming work. But if you do not need
such elements, you are not enforced to use them. 

With best regards Karsten

-- 
  Karsten Reincke    /\/\   (+49|0) 170 / 927 78 57
 Im Braungeröll 31   >oo<  mailto:address@hidden
60431 Frankfurt a.M.  \/    http://www.fodina.de/kr/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]