[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stacking of figured bass elements
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: stacking of figured bass elements |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 15:56:06 -0400 |
Hi Jean,
Sorry I didn’t respond to this:
> For a start, this can be useful:
> {
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.Y-offset = 4
> \mark \markup { agt } g'1
> \mark \markup { aht } g'1
> \mark \markup { agt } g'1
> }
Well, yes… and I’ve used that mechanism in my scores. My frustration is that
we’re already talking about three different parameters — padding,
staff-padding, and Y-offset — which are used in order to align text above
staves to their baseline (which is what the hypothetical user is trying to do),
and they behave differently (inconsistently, not at all, etc.) across different
grobs.
Am I the only one who sees this situation as sub-optimal?
Thanks,
Kieren.
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, (continued)
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, David Kastrup, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/06/12
Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
Re: stacking of figured bass elements,
Kieren MacMillan <=