[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stacking of figured bass elements
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: stacking of figured bass elements |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 15:37:22 -0400 |
Hi all,
Sorry for the typo in the last email… Here’s a “correct incantation”:
\version "2.23.4"
{
\override Score.RehearsalMark.padding = #2
\mark \markup { agt } g'1
\mark \markup { aht } g'1
\mark \markup { agt } g'1
}
I put “correct incantation” in quotes because it moves the RehearsalMarks, but
it’s not staff-padding [which would be consistent with the TextScript setting
David used], and it doesn’t align the markups to their baseline [as most users
would reasonably expect, and which would be consistent with other settings
like, apparently, TextScript.staff-padding].
This hodge-podge of apparently inconsistent parameters and behaviours is what I
refer to when I talk about how the markup handling in Lilypond isn’t optimal.
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, (continued)
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/13
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, David Kastrup, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, David Kastrup, 2022/06/12
- Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/06/12
Re: stacking of figured bass elements,
Kieren MacMillan <=
Re: stacking of figured bass elements, Kieren MacMillan, 2022/06/12