lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]


From: Jacques Menu
Subject: Re: [was: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.2]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:16:08 +0200

Hello Folks,

I’ve never heard about Xcode_11.3.1.xip.
The simple way to install Xcode is to take it from the App Store (needs about 
50 Mb these days).

JM

> Le 18 août 2022 à 08:48, Jean-Julien Fleck <jeanjulien.fleck@gmail.com> a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hello Jean-Louis,
> 
> Le jeu. 18 août 2022 à 03:10, Jean Louis THIRY <thiryjl@icloud.com> a écrit :
> 
> I have a question about the installation. Could this erratic behavior be a 
> result of this .sdk file being installed in the wrong order? is it possible 
> to uninstall Frescobaldi using some magic formula like "sudo port uninstall 
> frescobaldi" and do an install again so that the installer finds the sdk 
> file. Especially will there be a difference. Just an idea...
> 
> Well, it’s unlikely. I happen to have frescobaldi installed via a fresh new 
> MacPort procedure (after upgrading to MacOs Monterey) just last week and the 
> missing sdk message I encountered was related to all the qt5 stuff that 
> frescobaldi needed in order to be built. You were lucky it was not a stopper 
> as it was in my case: I had to manually add `use_xcode yes` in the 
> corresponding PortFile of py310-poppler-qt5 in order to make it build 
> properly. Perhaps it has since been corrected so that if the «standard» way 
> for qt5 to find the sdk won't work, they try the `use_xcode yes` trick 
> (whatever it does) before giving up.
> 
> All these problems, even if triggered during frescobaldi install, are 
> unrelated to it. That's just the way Macport is doing the job: whenever you 
> add a package to MacPort, it asks you what should be present on the machine 
> to make your app work and then try to install it by itself, saving the user 
> the trouble to install all the extensions and preventing multiple installs of 
> the same tools whenever two different packages need the same first building 
> block.
> 
> But as a matter of fact, it won't help to uninstall frescobaldi to try to 
> correct for lilypond path (as for one reason is that MacPort don't throw away 
> uninstalled port but keep them somewhere, ready to reinstall it without 
> further building in case you change your mind). I would rather suspect that 
> the search for different lilypond locations was done after you first looked 
> there (perhaps triggered by one of your tinkering), was written down 
> somewhere so that the next frescobaldi startup shows it.
> 
> Happy that you finally managed to get it work and have fun coding with lily 
> on frescobaldi !
> 
> -- 
> JJ Fleck
> Physique et Informatique
> PCSI1 Lycée Kléber




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]