lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: German notation


From: Lukas-Fabian Moser
Subject: Re: German notation
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:43:34 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1


By the way, there also
exists the opposite: In (older?) scores of symphonies by Anton
Bruckner, the violoncello part, if using the violin clef, is notated
one octave higher than sounding.

This is also common in Dvorak, for example. Strauss-Berlioz describe a precise rule for this (according to them, violin clef for cello is written one octave higher if it occurs i) right at the start of a piece or ii) after music in bass clef; it's written _loco_ if it comes after a passage in tenor clef). But then they (i.e. probably Berlioz) continue:

"Dieser durch nichts zu rechtfertigende Gebrauch führt um so häufiger zu Mißverständnissen, als manche Violoncellisten keine Notiz davon nehmen und den G-Schlüssel stets nur in seiner wirklichen Bedeutung nehmen."

(Roughly: There's no justification for this usage which often leads to confusion, in particular since some cellists are unaware of it and always read the treble clef in its standard meaning.)

Strange transposition rules also exist for horns, where in the violin
clef you transpose down, and in the bass clef you transpose up.

... and what's even worse, as soon as one has gotten used to this rule, one stumbles across (recent) scores that don't adhere to it any more. Cf. https://colindorman.com/old-vs-new-notation-bass-clef/

Lukas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]