lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiple instances of same articulation/bowing on one note


From: Jean Abou Samra
Subject: Re: Multiple instances of same articulation/bowing on one note
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:07:02 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0

On 01/02/2023 03:59, kieren@kierenmacmillan.info wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>> I would personally consider that a bug!
>> script-engraver.cc:
>>
>> void
>> Script_engraver::listen_articulation (Stream_event *ev)
>> {
>>   /* Discard double articulations for part-combining.  */
>>   for (vsize i = 0; i < scripts_.size (); i++)
>>     if (scm_is_eq (get_property (scripts_[i].event_, "articulation-type"),
>>                    get_property (ev, "articulation-type")))
>>       return;
>>
>>
>> Umm...
>  
> The fact that it's coded doesn’t make it not a bug… ;)
>  
> Should this be stripped down to a single markup without warning?
>  
> { g_\markup "umm…" ^\markup "umm…" }
>  
> If the user intentionally doubles anything — be it articulation, markup, 
> dynamic, or whatever — I consider it a bug it it’s stripped from the output. 
> <shrug>


Sorry, I was too oblique: I didn't mean to say it wasn't a bug.
Just that it's not a matter of simply removing that behavior,
because there is a reason for it in the first place.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]