[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple instances of same articulation/bowing on one note
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple instances of same articulation/bowing on one note |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:07:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 |
On 01/02/2023 03:59, kieren@kierenmacmillan.info wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> I would personally consider that a bug!
>> script-engraver.cc:
>>
>> void
>> Script_engraver::listen_articulation (Stream_event *ev)
>> {
>> /* Discard double articulations for part-combining. */
>> for (vsize i = 0; i < scripts_.size (); i++)
>> if (scm_is_eq (get_property (scripts_[i].event_, "articulation-type"),
>> get_property (ev, "articulation-type")))
>> return;
>>
>>
>> Umm...
>
> The fact that it's coded doesn’t make it not a bug… ;)
>
> Should this be stripped down to a single markup without warning?
>
> { g_\markup "umm…" ^\markup "umm…" }
>
> If the user intentionally doubles anything — be it articulation, markup,
> dynamic, or whatever — I consider it a bug it it’s stripped from the output.
> <shrug>
Sorry, I was too oblique: I didn't mean to say it wasn't a bug.
Just that it's not a matter of simply removing that behavior,
because there is a reason for it in the first place.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Multiple instances of same articulation/bowing on one note, Michael Werner, 2023/01/31