[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
rehearsalMarkFormatter => markFormatter in 2.24.0
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
rehearsalMarkFormatter => markFormatter in 2.24.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:45:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
I've noticed a name change in 2.24 where
rehearsalMarkFormatter has become markFormatter.
I want to make scores that can be compiled under either 2.22 or 2.24 so
I tried this:
8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
\version "2.24.0"
xxx = rehearsalMarkFormatter
%\version "2.22.0"
%xxx = markFormatter
\relative c'' {
\set Score.\xxx = #format-mark-box-alphabet
c1 \mark \default
c1 \mark \default
c1 \mark #8
c1 \mark \default
c1 \mark \default
}
8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
If the commenting out is switched round this continues to work.
(The definition of xxx would be in an include file in a versioned
directory).
My question is, is this a reasonable approach?
Specifically is it reliable to use variables in this way, as components
of a property?
Richard Shann
- rehearsalMarkFormatter => markFormatter in 2.24.0,
Richard Shann <=