[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rehearsalMarkFormatter => markFormatter in 2.24.0
|
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
|
Subject: |
Re: rehearsalMarkFormatter => markFormatter in 2.24.0 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:12:14 +0100 |
> Le 10 mars 2023 à 13:47, Richard Shann <richard@rshann.plus.com> a écrit :
>
> I've noticed a name change in 2.24 where
> rehearsalMarkFormatter has become markFormatter.
(You mean the other way around.)
> I want to make scores that can be compiled under either 2.22 or 2.24 so
> I tried this:
>
> 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
> \version "2.24.0"
> xxx = rehearsalMarkFormatter
>
> %\version "2.22.0"
> %xxx = markFormatter
>
> \relative c'' {
> \set Score.\xxx = #format-mark-box-alphabet
> c1 \mark \default
> c1 \mark \default
> c1 \mark #8
> c1 \mark \default
> c1 \mark \default
> }
>
> 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
> If the commenting out is switched round this continues to work.
> (The definition of xxx would be in an include file in a versioned
> directory).
You can also do
xxx = #(if (ly:version? >= '(2 23 6) 'rehearsalMarkFormatter 'markFormatter)
to have it picked automatically based on the current LilyPond version.
>
> My question is, is this a reasonable approach?
> Specifically is it reliable to use variables in this way, as components
> of a property?
Yes.