lout-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lout parsing


From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
Subject: Re: Lout parsing
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 08:35:48 +0100

>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Harding <address@hidden> writes:

    Ted> ( Re Message From: Blake McBride )
    >>  At 09:53 AM 2/18/96 -0600, address@hidden (Peter da Silva)
    >> wrote: >What's wrong with using different symbols for the two
    >> different kinds of >period? It's not so often that you use a
    >> dot other than at the end of a >sentence, why not \. it?  > >
    >> 
    >> I like!!
    >> 
    >> --blake

    Ted> Looks like a very neat solution. Extend it to \? and \! as
    Ted> well (and to others at user choice) and it should cover most
    Ted> foreseeable cases.

I like this solution too. But perhaps it could better be @. and @?
instead of \. \? etc.... (but sure, this is a tiny detail!)



N.B. Any opinions expressed here are solely mine, and not of my organization.
N.B. Les opinions exprimees ici me sont personnelles et n engagent pas le CEA.

Please cite a **pertinent part** of my mail in all answers
Veuillez citer une **partie pertinente** de mon courrier dans vos reponses



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Basile STARYNKEVITCH   ----  Commissariat a l Energie Atomique (civil)
DRN/DMT/SERMA * C.E. Saclay bat.470 * 91191 GIF/YVETTE CEDEX * France
fax: (33) [1] 69.08.85.68; phone: 69.08.40.66; homephone: 46.65.45.53
email: address@hidden (or else address@hidden);  
I speak french, english, russian. Je parle francais, anglais, russe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]