PostScript output of @Diag

[Giovanni Zezza]

Il Sun, 2 Jan 2000 02:52:53 +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov scriveva:

>What I like about @Diag is the ability to describe diagrams at high
>level.

I Was impressed by this, too. Nothing I can think to throw away from Lout.
I'd like there was a way to assure it is here even with other backend than
PostScript, instead. But we have already spoken on this, I think.

Speaking of PostScript output, instead, it seemed to me that nodes and
circles are a little poorer drawn than other graphic elements (at first
look, I thought nodes could be drawn as bitmap, but it doesn't seem to be
so, either). I looked into code, found a lot of to me undecipherable things
where I was sure to find a PostScript 'arc' instruction (or something on
the bitmap side supposition), and wasn't able to add some objective
evidence to this subjective feeling of mine.

Can you tell me something about? Nothing I'm worried about, just curious.

Ciao.