[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: current thoughts on PDF back end
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: current thoughts on PDF back end |
Date: |
Sun, 13 May 2001 02:10:21 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Sunday, May 13, 2001 at 10:45:56 (+1100), Jeff Kingston wrote: ]
> Subject: current thoughts on PDF back end
>
> So I'm hypothesising that the best way forward from here would be
> to withdraw the PDF back and end tell people who want PDF to run
> the pipeline
>
> lout | ps2pdf
I don't mind that at all. I've only ever used the lout PDF backend once
as far as I can remember, and generally I can convince people I have to
share documents with to simply accept PS. These days they can usually
figure out how to view it or print it on their own, and even PC users
generally know what to do with a *.gz file (PS files are of course
rather large but easily and effectively compressed).
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- current thoughts on PDF back end, Jeff Kingston, 2001/05/12
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end,
Greg A. Woods <=
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Paul Selormey, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Michael Piotrowski, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, David Duffy, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Mikko Huhtala, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, bln, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Christoph Breitkopf, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Christian Mock, 2001/05/14