[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: current thoughts on PDF back end
From: |
Mikko Huhtala |
Subject: |
Re: current thoughts on PDF back end |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2001 03:28:16 -0400 (EDT) |
I have had a very minor problem with Ghostscript's ps2pdf when making
PDF slides to be shown with Acrobat Reader. I used
@PageEnclose { @Box paint { colour } @Body }
to get background colours other than white. PDFs generated with Lout
show this right, but ps2pdf leaves a narrow white margin (probably only
one or two pixels) on the right and at the bottom. Anyway, I
invariably need to include EPS graphics in these presentations and the
margin hardly matters, so I use ps2pdf. Ghostscript (ps2pdf) seems to work
just fine on more typical black-on-white documents, although unlike
Lout, it produces PDFs that are mostly not human-readable but contain
binary parts for some reason (compression? font embedding?).
Mikko
- current thoughts on PDF back end, Jeff Kingston, 2001/05/12
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Greg A. Woods, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Paul Selormey, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Michael Piotrowski, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, David Duffy, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end,
Mikko Huhtala <=
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, bln, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Christoph Breitkopf, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Christian Mock, 2001/05/14